<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Idaho</title>
	<atom:link href="http://electioninspection.wordpress.com/idaho/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://electioninspection.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Election Forecasting Punditry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 02:36:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kent Marmon</title>
		<link>http://electioninspection.wordpress.com/idaho/#comment-2126</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent Marmon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 04:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electioninspection.wordpress.com/?page_id=224#comment-2126</guid>
		<description>I would like to know why you are ignoring the Libertarian Party candidate in the Idaho US Senate race.  The polls should include all five candidates to explain where the &quot;undecided&quot; voters are leaning.  This figure ranges from 17 to 23%.  Favorable ratings are not high for either LaRocco or Risch in one poll.  Voters being called (or polled) should be given all of the choices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to know why you are ignoring the Libertarian Party candidate in the Idaho US Senate race.  The polls should include all five candidates to explain where the &#8220;undecided&#8221; voters are leaning.  This figure ranges from 17 to 23%.  Favorable ratings are not high for either LaRocco or Risch in one poll.  Voters being called (or polled) should be given all of the choices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
